>bash squad
>svcvibe-code rescue

We fix Lovable, Bolt, Replit and v0 apps and get them to production.

If Lovable, Bolt, Replit, v0 or Cursor got your app most of the way and you're stuck on the rest, senior engineers can finish the job. We audit the code, fix the bugs the AI keeps circling, close the security holes it left behind, and set up deploys, payments, and monitoring so real users can rely on it.

No judgment. Building it yourself with Claude, Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, or v0 was a reasonable way to prove the idea. But there's a gap between "it runs" and "it's ready for customers", and that's the part we handle. You keep the product you built; we make it hold up.

all services →
>01when you need this

Sound familiar?

Every fix breaks two other things

You add one feature and three others stop working. "Fix it" makes it worse, and so does "undo that". The AI is going in circles, and so are you.

You suspect the security is bad

API keys sitting in the frontend, no real auth checks, a database anyone can query. The scary part of AI-generated apps is what they leave out, silently.

You can't ship it

It works on your machine and nowhere else. Domains, deploys, databases, payments, monitoring: the unglamorous last stretch that turns a prototype into a product.

Nobody can explain the codebase

The app exists, but no human understands it end to end. That's fine for a demo and a real risk once customers depend on it.

>02what you get

The work, concretely.

Code and security audit

We read the whole repo and give you a plain-English report: what's solid, what's broken, and what's dangerous. You get it whether or not you hire us for the fix.

auditsecurity reviewreport

Fix and harden

Fixes at the root cause, not patches on patches. Real authentication, error handling, input validation, and a codebase a future developer (or a future you) can work in.

bug fixesauthrefactor

Launch

Domains, deploys, databases, payments, monitoring, backups. We carry it over the line to a production setup that doesn't depend on your laptop staying open.

deploypaymentsmonitoring

Handoff you own

Documentation, a walkthrough, and accounts in your name. You own the code, the infrastructure, and the knowledge, with no retainer required.

docswalkthroughownership
>03how it works

From first email to handoff.

  1. Send us the repo

    Tell us what the app is supposed to do and give us read access to the code. If it's on Lovable, Bolt, v0, or Replit, we can work from an export.

  2. We audit it

    A senior engineer reads the code and maps the real state of it: bugs, security holes, dead ends, and the parts the AI actually got right.

  3. You get a fixed-scope plan

    A written proposal: what we'll fix, what it costs, and how long it should take. If a rebuild would be cheaper than a rescue, we say so.

  4. We fix and harden it

    We work in your repo with reviewable commits, so you can watch the app get healthier instead of handing it into a black box.

  5. We launch it and hand you the keys

    Production deploy, monitoring, docs, and a walkthrough. You leave with a running product you own and understand.

>04faq

Questions people actually ask.

Can you fix an app built with Claude, Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, or v0?

Yes. Which tool built it matters less than the state of the code, and the problems tend to repeat: tangled logic, missing auth, secrets in the frontend, and no path to deployment. We work directly in your repo, or from an export if the app lives inside a hosted builder.

Is it cheaper to fix my vibe-coded app or rebuild it from scratch?

Often a rescue is cheaper, because AI tools tend to get the product shape closer than the engineering. Not always, though. The audit answers this for your specific codebase, and if a rebuild is the cheaper path, we'll tell you and quote both.

How much does vibe-code rescue cost?

It depends on the state of the code: how much needs fixing versus rewriting, how sensitive the data is, whether payments are involved, and what launch requires. So we don't quote blind. The audit comes first and produces a fixed-scope, fixed-price proposal, so you know the full cost before committing to the fix. There's no open-ended hourly meter.

Is my AI-generated app safe to launch as-is?

Probably not without a review. Problems that come up again and again in AI-generated apps include API keys exposed in frontend code, missing authorization checks (any logged-in user can read anyone's data), no input validation, and no rate limiting. None of these are visible in a demo, and any of them can hurt you once real users arrive.

Will you judge the code, or me, for vibe coding it?

No. A working prototype gives us something concrete to build on, whether you've shown it to customers yet or not. We review the code to understand what can stay and what needs work. The goal is to help you launch a product you can trust, not judge how you got started.

What do you need from me to get started?

Three things: what the app is supposed to do, read access to the code (a Git repo or an export from your builder), and access to wherever it runs today if it's deployed. From there we can audit it without taking anything down.

>related services
Custom software & websitesAI & automationYour engineering team
>05book

Tell us the hard thing.

It takes about two minutes. An engineer reads every one of these, not a bot and not a sales sequence. Whether it's broken, half-built, or still just an idea, tell us what it is. If we're not the right fit, we'll say so.

bash: new-project.sh
>
▾

No spam, no sales reps. One engineer, one reply.

direct line

Rather just email?

Skip the form. Write it however you like; the same engineer reads it either way.

what happens next

An engineer reads your note (no triage bot, no lead scoring) and replies fast, usually within 1 business day. If it looks like a fit, we offer a few times for a 25-minute call.